Political News - Conservative Views - Education - Solutions
As more (and more) revelations come out about slimeball and (alleged) serial rapist Harvey Weinstein, there is a more sinister conspiracy still hidden in the Hollywood hills: pedophilia.
It seems that, for a decade and more, courage was in short supply in Hollywood, as dozens (maybe hundreds) of people knew of Harvey's predilections (for starlets) and did absolutely nothing. It has now been reported that as far back as 2004, the N.Y. Times was aware of at least some of the extent of Harvey Weinstein's sexual abuse and, one suspects for political reasons, decided to spike a story that would have exposed and possibly put a stop to his deviancy. How many women were sexually assaulted or even raped between 2004 and today? It's been reported that Matt Damon and Russell Crowe were part of a group that pressured the Times not to report on these salacious activities. Are they, in part, culpable for subsequent assaults? How about all of the dozens of Miramax employees and others who sent young women to Harvey to be exploited and abused?
Posted on October 11, 2017 by Steven Hayward in Hollywood
Hitler Learns About Harvey Weinstein
I know, I’ve been trying to swear off this overdone genre, but really, how can you resist applying it to the collective meltdown of Harvey Weinstein and Democratic Hollywood?