Immediate Action!

Please send the following letters to the appropriate office immediately!

Simply highlight and copy the letters- follow the Convenient Link to The Contacts List- Locate the address- paste the letter into the email link- that easy! or copy and paste to a word doc to print and mail!

 

Page updated May 19,2011

=========================================

We should bring back the Committee on Un-American Activities!

 

 

 


We believe it is time for the  re-establishment of the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC). This Congressional Committee was an investigative committee that investigated allegations of subversion of the US government. HUAC looked into persons accused of being COMMUNISTS with the government and US media including Hollywood.

Treason is taking up arms against our nation, or giving aid and comfort to our enemies. Sedition is actively encouraging acts of treason. Treasonous and seditious activities are illegal; they are not protected as free speech.

America has dealt with treason in the past. For example:  The Rosenbergs were Soviet spies, executed for passing nuclear secrets to the enemy. Although many on the Left defend them to this day, the "Venona Cables" (decoded Soviet communicates) confirm their espionage, and Khrushchev identified them as Soviet spies in his memoirs.  In more reasonable times, treason and sedition were crimes, for which death was the likely penalty.



The prosecution of treason and sedition became less popular due to the backlash against Sen. Joseph McCarthy. Although none of the people named in McCarthy's investigations were ever proven innocent, it has become legend that McCarthy ruined the lives of many innocent liberals. Even though the "Venona Cables" later proved many of McCarthy's "victims" to be guilty of crimes far worse than those they were accused of, McCarthyism has become a slur levied against anyone who recognizes the un-American activities of traitors.



Michael Moore makes millions producing anti-American propaganda. He actively gives aid and comfort to our enemies, and allows his film (Fahrenheit 9/11) to be used as a recruitment tool for Hezbollah and other terrorist groups. Tokyo Rose was convicted for participating in lesser acts, but Moore was seated beside former President Carter at the Democratic National Convention!



John Walker Lindh joined al Qaeda, and took up arms against our forces when we invaded Afghanistan. He participated in the prison uprising that killed CIA agent Michael Spann. Instead of being convicted and executed for his obvious treason, he was imprisoned like a petty criminal.



Those who commit sedition, like Columbia University professor Nicholas De Genova, who called for, "a million Mogadishus" when we invaded Iraq, and the protestors who hold signs saying, "We support our troops when they shoot their officers" are given a pass. They are not prosecuted, deported, executed, imprisoned or blackballed; they are allowed to prosper and profit from their treason and sedition.



This should not be. If our country is worth defending by means of war, it is surely worth defending by legal means. Due to timidity or apathy, we are not enforcing our laws. We are allowing our enemies to undermine our resolve, and to recruit soldiers for their armies in American schools, prisons, mosques, movie theaters and living rooms.

 

HUAC was to a large extent successful in EXPOSING COMMUNISTS infiltration as it rooted out COMMUNIST OPERATIVES in the government, media, and Hollywood. Further, HUAC exposed the EXTENT of COMMUNIST INFILTRATION in the Hollywood film industry and, it served to PROTECT America from COMMUNISM, the most serious threat America faced at the time in the 1950s.

HUAC was disbanded after the 1950s and an entire generation of LEFTISTS in ACADEMIA and the media claimed that HUAC and Senator Josep McCarthy had been nothing more than a mere “witch hunt.” They further alleged that HUAC and McCarthy had done nothing but destroy peoples’ lives and that these people had “nothing” to do with COMMUNISM.

 

Then along came the 1990s and the VENONA TRANSCRIPTS! Low and behold, these transcripts were of INTELLIGENCE INTERCEPTS from the former SOVIET UNION and they proved that MOST of the people HUAC had investigated in the 1950s HAD BEEN in FACT involved with COMMUNIST GROUPS! Further, these transcripts also proved that many of these people had ACTIVELY SPIED on the US for the SOVIETS! So, even today the old COMMUNISTS in our midst still claim that HUAC was just a bunch of Right-Wing nut cases filled to the brim with paranoia. However, the PROOF says just the OPPOSITE!

 

The old far left, now exists in the ACLU, the National Lawyers Guild, and other organizations that are today’s enemy within.  And that threat INCLUDES radical Muslim TERRORISM, especially the kind which we face from converts right here in the United States. This puts the US at greater risk than we have ever experienced in the past and this is why we NEED to BRING BACK HUAC today!!

 

Note: Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) appeared to lend support in a recent interview to the re-creation of a congressional committee directly descended from the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC), a panel that was originally formed at the height of the Red Scare to be the chamber's deliberative body to handle the duties of Sen. Joe McCarthy's anti-communism crusade.

In 2008, Rep. King's conservative colleague, Rep. Michele Bachmann also endorsed a new wave of investigations into whether members of Congress were "pro-America or anti-America. 

We urge our leaders to re-institute the House Committee on Un-American Activities, and we should prosecute the crimes of treason and sedition. This is not a partisan issue, or a conservative issue; it is a matter of enforcing existing laws and taking the steps necessary to protect this nation. It would be the ultimate irony if we were to establish free, democratic nations in the Middle East, and defeat Islamic terrorism abroad, only for our nation to fall at the hands of our own disloyal citizens.

 

======================================================
Eleven States File Legislation Requiring Birth Certificate To Get On 2012 Presidential Ballot! The eleven are Arizona, Connecticut, Georgia, Indiana, Maine, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania and Texas! Let's make it all 50!    Presidential candidates: Better find those birth certificates!

Please use the following letters below to send to your Representatives in State Government! You can mail, fax, email to your Reps. Simply Highlight and Copy the letters then click the link to Contact Addresses. You can also print out for hand-outs to your neighbors. Use your imagination to spread the word to help preserve our Freedoms.

For All your Contact Addresses, Email and Fax numbers follow the link below
Also, Please scroll to the bottom of this page for a Letter provided by a friend of mine regarding: Congress must DEFEND DOMA in court, since President Obama refuses duty...

We need to take Immediate Action now! Take a Stand Now!

Letter#1- Courtesy of "Robin"


Dear Senate/Assembly Members,

 

I write to you today respectfully requesting that you join the 11 States that are requiring, "that candidates for President and Vice-President provide their original birth certificates in order to be placed on the ballot." That is needed to make sure the candidate "is a natural born United States citizen, prior to certifying that the candidate is qualified to appear on the ballot."

 In addition, you also need to include the following:

1. Provide a procedure for and declare that citizens have "standing" to challenge the documentation.

2. Require candidates to provide a certified copy of their birth certificate and include an affirmation they meet the Constitution's requirements for the President.

3. Paperwork would need to document they meet the "eligibility requirements of Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States." It requires an affidavit that says: "I was born a citizen of the United States of America and was subject exclusively to the jurisdiction of the United States of America, owing allegiance to no other country at the time of my birth."

4. Candidates would have to document their eligibility and also provide for protection for state taxpayers to prevent them from being billed for "unnecessary expense and litigation" involving the failure of 'federal election officials' to do their duty.

5. Allow the public access. It demands an "original" birth certificate issued by a state, the federal government, or documentation of a birth of a U.S. citizen abroad.

6. Demand documentation of constitutional eligibility making sure that Presidential candidates meet the Constitution's requirements for age, residency and being a "natural born citizen." They must prove that they are a natural born citizen by providing an original long form birth certificate and proof that both parents were US citizens at the time of the birth.

7.  Within ten days after submittal of the names of the candidates, the national political party committee shall submit an affidavit of the Presidential candidate in which the Presidential candidate states the candidate's citizenship and age and shall append to the affidavit documents that prove that the candidate is a natural born citizen, prove the candidate's age and prove that the candidate meets the residency requirements for President of the United States as prescribed in article II, section 1, Constitution of the United States.

 

At the time the Constitution was written, many analysts agree, a "natural born citizen" was considered to be a citizen born of two citizen parents. If that indeed is correct, Obama never would have been qualified to be president, as he himself has confirmed his father was a Kenyan subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom, making Obama a dual citizen with Kenyan and American parentage at his birth.

The challenges to Obama's eligibility allege he does not qualify because he was not born in Hawaii in 1961 as he claims, or that he fails to qualify because he was a dual citizen, through his father, of the U.S. and the United Kingdom's Kenyan territory when he was born and the framers of the Constitution specifically excluded dual citizens from eligibility.

 A year ago, polls indicated that roughly half of American voters were aware of a dispute over Obama's eligibility. Recent polls, however, by organizations including CNN, show that roughly six in 10 American voters hold serious doubts that Obama is eligible under the Constitution's demands.

Obama may be able to continue showing contempt for the Constitution and the rule of law for the next two years, as he has demonstrated his willingness to do in his first two years in office. A day of reckoning is coming. Even if only one significant state, with a sizable Electoral College count, decides a candidate for election or re-election has failed to prove his or her eligibility, which makes it nearly impossible for the candidate to win.

The American people demand to know that a person running for the highest office in the land, is indeed qualified under our Constitution to hold the office in which they seek. I urge you to join the 11 other states that have put forth a bill to protect our Constitution and our Republic.

 

Respectfully submitted,

 

 

Contact Addresses Email and Fax

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Website News!

Please sign our important petition! Your "signature" sends letters directly to your Senators! NEW!!


YOU MAY CHANGE YOUR LOCATION AND ID ON THIS LIVE FEED SIMPLY CLICK THE TINY WORD -MENU-

Latest Activity

Profile Icon
David Gallant replied to David Gallant's discussion 'Brokered Convention 101'
Do this, press the ALT key and while it is pressed type any sequence of three digits. For example…
5 hours ago
Profile Icon
Profile Icon
Jo DeFranco replied to David Gallant's discussion 'Brokered Convention 101'
Very interesting.  Somehow I knew most of this but like Suzie wrote "I have forgotten…
11 hours ago
Profile Icon
David Gallant replied to Carole Lawrence's discussion 'Texas Teacher Fighting for Job After Telling Student ‘Go Back to Mexico’'
I think it is fair to say there are more than just disabled people who might need what we consider…
12 hours ago
Profile Icon
tom dodd replied to Carole Lawrence's discussion 'Texas Teacher Fighting for Job After Telling Student ‘Go Back to Mexico’'
...WHAT we should do is burn a 200 mile wide swath from the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of…
13 hours ago
Profile Icon
tom dodd replied to Carole Lawrence's discussion 'Texas Teacher Fighting for Job After Telling Student ‘Go Back to Mexico’'
...WELFARE was designed to help the DISABLED... if a person has the mental and physical capacity to…
13 hours ago
Profile Icon
David Gallant replied to Carole Lawrence's discussion 'Texas Teacher Fighting for Job After Telling Student ‘Go Back to Mexico’'
Do we really want it? I think it is just a matter of time before we do get aggressive with Mexico…
14 hours ago
Profile Icon
David Gallant replied to Carole Lawrence's discussion 'Texas Teacher Fighting for Job After Telling Student ‘Go Back to Mexico’'
I'm not sure I get your logic with driving a car disqualifies someone for welfare? But I do…
14 hours ago

© 2012   Created by Suzie (admin).   Powered by .

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service